Re: now plant clubs- Reverse sexism?!

---

• To: g*@hort.net
• Subject: Re: [CHAT] now plant clubs- Reverse sexism?!
• From: "SallyAnn" s*@aug.com
• Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 14:46:26 -0500
• References: 7455252.1043763776858.JavaMail.nobody@bigbird.psp.pas.earthlink.net

I was speaking historically as in no vote no property for females, etc. even
up to the 70's here -a man had to sign for a mortgage, et....Guess I am of
that generation-but of course any of those isms are repugnant!
----- Original Message -----
From: Kitty <kmrsy@earthlink.net>
To: <gardenchat@hort.net>
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 6:27 AM
Subject: Re: [CHAT] now plant clubs- Reverse sexism?!


> I have to ask this qstn. The subject line has been bugging me. What do
> you mean by reverse sexism? Being sexist is the same abhorant behavior
> whether it is a preference of male over female or female over male.
> Reverse sexism then would be the opposite; no preference, wouldn't it?
>
>
> Kitty
>
>
> If you have weeds, you don't have enough plants.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
> message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT

• References:
  • Re: now plant clubs- Reverse sexism?!
    • From: K*

• Prev by Date: Re: Composting citrus
• Next by Date: Re: Re: now plant clubs
• Previous by thread: Re: now plant clubs- Reverse sexism?!
• Next by thread: Re: now plant clubs- Reverse sexism?!