Re: Re: habitat/ponds
- To: g*@hort.net
- Subject: Re: Re: [CHAT] habitat/ponds
- From: &* <j*@prairieinet.net>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 08:02:35 -0600
I agree, koi ponds are much more work and less attractive. My 2" koi
grew to be 4ft in 5 years and multiplied worse than rabbits. I wish my
pond was not so deep.
Donna
----- Original Message -----
From: TeichFlora@aol.com
Sent: 1/28/2004 6:42:23 AM
To: gardenchat@hort.net
Subject: Re: [CHAT] habitat/ponds
> The one where the one butterfly Koi is in with some other goldfish, is 17 by
> 20, 3 foot deep. Unlike Goldfish, Koi will outgrow a pond. They can get to a
> couple feet long or more. Mine is about 22 inches and is 3 years old. Got
> him as a baby, as a gift. Koi ponds and watergardens are totally different
> ball games. For a first time pond, and especially if it is smaller, I'd stick
> with Goldfish. They are a lot less finicky, don't require as much space,
> aeration, and filtration.
> Just my opinion, for what it's worth.
>
> Noreen
> zone 9
> Texas gulf Coast
>
> In a message dated 1/27/2004 8:14:59 PM Central Standard Time,
> gardenchat-owner@hort.net writes:
> So, Cathy, Donna & Noreen (and everyone on the list who has ponds), how large
> are your ponds and do you keep koi? I was going to avoid them until I get
> the hang of the pond thing. But I also am concerned that my pond may be a
> little small for koi.
>
> Eva
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Support hort.net -- join the hort.net fund drive!
> http://www.hort.net/funds/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Support hort.net -- join the hort.net fund drive!
http://www.hort.net/funds/
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index