Re: Annoying email go to jail - another look
- To: g*@hort.net
- Subject: Re: [CHAT] Annoying email go to jail - another look
- From: james singer i*@verizon.net
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:55:19 -0500
- In-reply-to: 45F78C70CE69EC4090F92C700FFFAD7D024BF644@fsfspm39
- References: 45F78C70CE69EC4090F92C700FFFAD7D024BF644@fsfspm39
Interesting. And this from a guy who thinks NAS's domestic spying is not only legal but constitutional.
On Jan 11, 2006, at 12:13 PM, Johnson Cyndi D Civ 95 CG/SCSRT wrote:
Another list I read has a longer explanation of this, if you're interested:
http://lists.elistx.com/archives/interesting-people/200601/ msg00138.html
Cyndi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT
Island Jim Southwest Florida 27.0 N, 82.4 W Hardiness Zone 10 Heat Zone 10 Minimum 30 F [-1 C] Maximum 100 F [38 C] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT
- References:
- Annoying email go to jail - another look
- From: J* C* D* C* 9* C*
- From: J* C* D* C* 9* C*
- Annoying email go to jail - another look
- Prev by Date: double messages
- Next by Date: Re: double messages
- Previous by thread: Annoying email go to jail - another look
- Next by thread: double messages