hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Emily/auralies point

Exactly David! And it would help if they would give those of us
Christian faithful who do subscribe to the modern day science a
break...they don't exactly give us credit for being real Christians!

Hills, IA  zone 5

Work for the Lord:  the pay isn't much but the retirement is out of this world!

 --- On Wed 07/13, David Franzman < dfranzma@pacbell.net > wrote:
From: David Franzman [mailto: dfranzma@pacbell.net]
To: gardenchat@hort.net
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 11:11:40 -0700
Subject: Re: [CHAT] Emily/auralies point

Yep, I agree with you Auralie. I have been having a similar discussion
with <br>someone here. That's why I didn't label the folks who don't buy
into the E. <br>Theory. It has nothing to do with whether you believe in
God or whether you <br>accept Jesus Christ as your savior. I don't think
that belief in a higher <br>form is mutually exclusive to believing in
the forces of nature. Yet there <br>are those who can not accept that if
you have God then what he created is <br>exactly what we have today. Not
sure I understand the inflexability. I <br>would think they would have
more adherents if they worked with the facts on <br>the table a little
more instead of swimming against the current of modern


Original Message ----- <br>From: <Aplfgcnys@aol.com><br>To:
<gardenchat@hort.net><br>Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 7:29
AM<br>Subject: Re: [CHAT] Emily<br><br><br>> In a message dated
07/13/2005 9:47:54 AM

Eastern Daylight Time,<br>> zsanders@midsouth.rr.com writes:<br>> I
realize that after I wrote the 40% remark that I had alienated
almost<br>>> half the group. Not trying to do that...I hope ya'll
know.<br>> It seems to be hard for some people to believe, but there
are<br>> devout Christians who are not ignorant, uneducated yahoos.<br>>
Just as there are Muslims who are not Taliban. Unfortunately<br>> we
tend to fixate on the characteristic that offends us most and<br>>
stigmatize the entire group.<br>><br>>
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the<br>>
message text UNSUBSCRIBE
sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the<br>message

Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement