Re: Rainier

---

• To: g*@hort.net
• Subject: Re: [CHAT] Rainier
• From: &* R* F* <g*@well.com>
• Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:57:11 -0400
• In-reply-to: <D5C962A5-C966-11D8-929A-000A959AC6B4@rnet.com>
• References: <D5C962A5-C966-11D8-929A-000A959AC6B4@rnet.com>

People tend to forget that Rainier is a dormant volcano. If it decides to blow...goodby Seattle and Tacoma.
Cathy
On Monday, June 28, 2004, at 10:40 PM, Bonnie Holmes wrote:

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I've read that Rainier is 'rotten' to the core, and more likely to
'disintegrate' than erupt (a la Mt. St. Helens). The difficulty with
a such a scenario is in the probability of resultant lahars. Think of the
latter as rivers of boiling hot concrete rushing down valleys...
-jrf
--
Jim Fisher
Vienna, Virginia USA
38.9 N 77.2 W
USDA Zone 7
Max. 105 F [40 C], Min. 5 F [-15 C]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Support hort.net -- join the hort.net fund drive!
http://www.hort.net/funds/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Rainier
    • From: c* c* &*

• References:
  • Re: hum
    • From: c* c* &*

• Prev by Date: Re: now Kitty's bug - was-Yellowjackets
• Next by Date: RE: tomato woes
• Previous by thread: Re: hum
• Next by thread: Re: Rainier