Re: Clematis mystery

Thanks, Donna.  The original blossom looks liek Clematis integrifolia,
but the plant description doesn't fit.  It describes a herbaceous perennial
2-3 feet.  This plant sends outnumerous 4-6 foot, very thin, brittle vines.
I would buy your reversion theory if there were only one other kind of
blossom, but there are three other, very different blooms on the same
plant. Some of the blooms look like 'Mrs. Robert Brydon' and the plant
seems similar, but that still doesn't account for the other two distinct
types of bloom.
Auralie
 
In a message dated 06/13/2007 12:39:39 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
gossiper@sbcglobal.net writes:

Sounds like a plant that part of it reverted back to a parent...

A few years back they were promoting a 'bush' version, but can't
remember it's name. I did buy it, but it didn't survive the winter.


Maybe one of these non-vining clematis is it?

http://www.gardenvines.com/catalog/clematis-nonvining-clematis-c-21_29.html?os
Csid=e2fc7625a7adce0eea1dddfc1f5fa2b7





************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index