hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Clematis mystery

Thanks, Donna.  The original blossom looks liek Clematis integrifolia,
but the plant description doesn't fit.  It describes a herbaceous perennial
2-3 feet.  This plant sends outnumerous 4-6 foot, very thin, brittle vines.
I would buy your reversion theory if there were only one other kind of
blossom, but there are three other, very different blooms on the same
plant. Some of the blooms look like 'Mrs. Robert Brydon' and the plant
seems similar, but that still doesn't account for the other two distinct
types of bloom.
In a message dated 06/13/2007 12:39:39 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
gossiper@sbcglobal.net writes:

Sounds like a plant that part of it reverted back to a parent...

A few years back they were promoting a 'bush' version, but can't
remember it's name. I did buy it, but it didn't survive the winter.

Maybe one of these non-vining clematis is it?


************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement