Re: OT: arctic drilling

---

• To: g*@hort.net
• Subject: Re: [CHAT] OT: arctic drilling
• From: "Chapel Ridge Wal Mart National Hearing Center" 4*@nationalhearing.com
• Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:36:47 -0600
• References: <772628.1111059563029.JavaMail.root@Sniper29>

OK, I can accept that, but hasn't anyone heard of the concept "two steps
forward, one step back"?    The 43 mpg was the 2 step, the decrease for
quality air was the one step.  They've had 30 years to work on the next
two-steps forward.

Kitty
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Donna" <gossiper@sbcglobal.net>

> The government's air pollution requirements caused the decrease in mpg.
>
> Not that I am against trying to keep our air clean, but you asked why.
>
> Donna
>
> >
> > You know what I don't understand? THIRTY years ago I bought a car that
had
> > a
> > sticker  that showed it got 30 mpg city and 40 mpg highway.  It actually
> > averaged 43 mpg.  And where are we now?
> >
> > Kitty
> > neIN, Z5
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
> message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT

• Prev by Date: Re: Garden Vision
• Next by Date: Re: >gardens
• Previous by thread: Re: OT: arctic drilling
• Next by thread: Re: OT: arctic drilling