Re: news of the day
- To: g*@hort.net
- Subject: Re: [CHAT] news of the day
- From: "Bonnie Holmes" h*@usit.net
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 09:18:53 -0800
This was true at first. But, we have a cordless that stays in the charge
cradle until used and have never had a problem with it. This was also
true of cellphones at first. I am wondering if the battery type would make
a difference...it did with the cellphones. It seems that the solar
industry would need to address the problem of those of us who live in
cloudy places. Anyone know?
Bonnie Zone 6+ ETN
> [Original Message]
> From: Kitty <kmrsy@comcast.net>
> To: <gardenchat@hort.net>
> Date: 11/09/2003 7:27:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [CHAT] news of the day
>
> Bonnie,
> I don't know the trigger time for solar light batteries but think about
> this:
> Do you have a cordless telephone? I got my first one a few yrs ago. It
> explained that the battery needed a full charge each time you charged it
and
> not to put it in the charger when not in use. If you give it short
charges
> each use will have less glow time and it will shorten the life of the
> battery (sort of like frequent lawn sprinkling causes shorter grass roots)
> If left in the charger it also shortens the battery life. These nicad
> rechargeable batteries are expensive. How often will you need to replace
> them in your lights? I'm not against the idea. I would love to use
solar,
> but it's not prudent here. Hopefully it will be for you.
>
> Kitty
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bonnie Holmes" <holmesbm@usit.net>
> To: <gardenchat@hort.net>
> Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 10:23 AM
> Subject: Re: [CHAT] news of the day
>
>
> > Kitty, I have the same consideration here. For some time, I have
wanted a
> > small water garden and would prefer solar but we do get a lot of rain.
> > For example, it rained almost everyday in July. I was concerned that
the
> > water wouldn't move enough but didn't realize that batteries wouldn't
last
> > if they weren't charged. Do you know the trigger time?
> >
> > Bonnie Zone 6+ ETN
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > [Original Message]
> > > From: Kitty <kmrsy@comcast.net>
> > > To: <gardenchat@hort.net>
> > > Date: 11/08/2003 10:39:19 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [CHAT] news of the day
> > >
> > > Theresa,
> > > I've tried solar lights, but with no success. You're in sunny CA and
> I'm
> > in
> > > often dreary IN. Last January had no days of sun at all. And even
this
> > > summer was a bust. Consequently the batteries in them don't charge
well
> > > enough before they come on again and they eventually die.
> > > Kitty
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Theresa" <tchessie@comcast.net>
> > > To: <gardenchat@hort.net>
> > > Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 9:39 PM
> > > Subject: RE: [CHAT] news of the day
> > >
> > >
> > > > I finally bought a solar powered outdoor light. I'd wanted one for
a
> > > while
> > > > for the garden-side of my house which has no light or wiring. So,
> > bought
> > > a
> > > > little brinkman solor light. It;s not super bright, but casts
enough
> > > light
> > > > to ward off unwanted visitors, to see my way to dump stuff in the
> > compost
> > > > pile after dark, and of course, to see if the chicken in done on the
> > > > barbecue! So, I'm happy with it. It has a little solar panel
about 6
> > x6
> > > > inches that has a really long wire (so you can position it
optimally)
> > the
> > > > light looks like a typical 2 bulb floodlight. I found it online for
> > $79.
> > > > It was really easy to install and way cheaper and easier that
running
> > wire
> > > > or hiring an electrician!
> > > >
> > > > I also love my battery-powered electric lawnmower!
> > > >
> > > > Theresa
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: owner-gardenchat@hort.net [o*@hort.net]On
> > > > Behalf Of Bonnie & Bill Morgan
> > > > Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 7:48 AM
> > > > To: gardenchat@hort.net
> > > > Subject: RE: [CHAT] news of the day
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > May we someday wake up and go for more renewable, cleaner, energy
> > sources!
> > > > I'd thought that the oil embargo decades ago would have put our
> > government
> > > > in the mood to fund research and better fuels for our future. It
> would
> > > also
> > > > help us need non-friendly oil baring countries less and less, to the
> > point
> > > > where the US could sustain its own needs within the country. It is
> why
> > > some
> > > > of us use solar fuel/fuel cells, hybrid vehicles, geothermal heat,
> etc.
> > > >
> > > > O.K., so I'm down off my soapbox. Sorry.
> > > > Blessings,
> > > > Bonnie (SW OH - zone 5)
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: owner-gardenchat@hort.net [o*@hort.net]
On
> > > Behalf
> > > > Of Donna
> > > > Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 7:06 AM
> > > > To: gardenchat@hort.net
> > > > Subject: [CHAT] news of the day
> > > >
> > > > This came thru my news today... thought you might want to read it.
The
> > > > again, you probably all know this already....
> > > >
> > > > Donna
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Good Mileage 98 Tons of Plants Per Gallon
> > > >
> > > > SALT LAKE CITY (UPI) -- A New University of Utah study shows 98 tons
> of
> > > > prehistoric, buried plant material is needed to produce just one
> gallon
> > > > of gasoline to power our vehicles. Researcher Jeff Dukes asked, "Can
> you
> > > > imagine loading 40 acres worth of wheat -- stalks, roots and all --
> into
> > > > the tank of your car or SUV every 20 miles?" But he says that's how
> much
> > > > ancient plant matter had to be buried millions of years ago and
> > > > converted by pressure, heat and time into oil to produce one gallon
of
> > > > gasoline today.
> > > >
> > > > He also calculated the amount of fossil fuel burned during just 1997
> > > > totaled 97 million billion pounds of carbon -- the equivalent of
more
> > > > than 400 times all the plant matter that grows in the world during
> just
> > > > one year. Asked why he conducted the study, Dukes said "Fossil fuel
> > > > consumption is widely recognized as unsustainable. However, there
has
> > > > been no attempt to calculate the amount of energy that was required
to
> > > > generate fossil fuels." The study is to be published in the November
> > > > issue of the journal Climatic Change.
> > > >
> > > > Copyright 2003 by United Press International. All rights reserved
> > > >
> > > >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
> > > > message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT
> > > >
> > > >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
> > > > message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT
> > > >
> > > >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
> > > > message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
> > > message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
> > message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
> message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index