Re: now Horticulture
- To: g*@hort.net
- Subject: Re: now Horticulture
- From: A*@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 09:16:39 EST
I find that is a problem for me, more and more. Also, I have found that after
about four years a magazine begins to repeat topics. I can understand this
more now that I have been writing a newsletter for my club for the last 16
years and find it harder and harder to find a new topic. I think our
problem may be that we have already read and studied so many things
that what appeals to the "average" person seems elementary to us.
In the Horticulture Schools I have run, I frequently find people who have
absolutely no knowledge of basic plant structure and function - and these
are people who are at least interested enough to take the courses. I say
"that's just high-school biology," and they look at me blankly. Don't
schools teach botany any more? I know, I took all the "boy" courses in
high school - geometry, chemistry, biology, etc. - rather than home ec.,
because that's what interested me (boys, too, of course), but surely some
of these things are so basic.
Auralie
In a message dated 11/16/2006 6:36:53 AM Eastern Standard Time,
andreah@hargray.com writes:
I like the regional writings sometimes, but I agree that mainly they are too
"elementary" (can't think of a better word this early) for me. I want to
know things I don't already know about. They seem to always say things that
should be obvious to serious gardeners. Or is that just my bias?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index