This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: Loosestrife alternatives and facts
A partial list of ornamental alternatives to purple loosestrife is included
in the article "Integrated management of purple loosestrife", The IPM
Practitioner, October 2002.
Perennials with "bright flowers similar to purple loosestrife"
blazing star or gay feather, Liatris spp.
Delphinium spp
false spirea, Astilbe arendsii
foxglove, Digitalis purpurea
lupine, Lupinus spp
cardinal flower, Lobelia cardinalis
obedient plant, Physostegia virginiana
Salvia superba
Siberian iris
spike speedwell, Veronica spicata
"Native plants should be chosen when possible. If natives escape from your
garden, there are potentially fewer ecological impacts. Contact your local
nursery or garden center for more information." Preferably one that doesn't
sell it?
BIRC emphasizes prevention, notes that sales of cultivars should be
restricted. Notes that most noxious weeds are pioneer species and that
maintaining a dense ground cover of desirable plants with a closed canopy
will usually help prevent their establishment.
A few more facts: there are at least 28 cultivars, sterile cultivars outcross
with wild populations and produce long-lasting viable seed, a single plant
can produce 2.7 million seeds per year, each seed about the size of a grain
of sand, seed establishes quickly in disturbed areas, tolerates a wide range
of soils including sand, clay, gravel and crushed rock, it has spread to all
states in the US and all provinces of Canada except the Yukon and Northwest
Territory, probably aided by fertilizer runoff from surrounding farmlands.
Purple loosestrife forms dense monocultures, chokes off wildlife habitat,
impedes water flow in drainage and irrigation ditches, its rapid leaf
decomposition rates can alter nutrient cycling, "is a less efficient
biofilter than cattails and other native vegetation it replaces. Nutrients
released from decomposing leaves can cause overgrowth and oxygen depletion in
downstream water bodies."
Gypsy moths feed on it, but apparently not enough! No single method of
control is effective, hence emphasis on IPM, including prevention, biological
control, hand removal, cutting, flooding, smothering and planting competitive
vegetation. And long-term commitment.
Is this enough?
Sally
_______________________________________________
gardenwriters mailing list
gardenwriters@lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/gardenwriters
GWL has searchable archives at:
http://www.hort.net/lists/gardenwriters
If you have photos for GWL, send them to gwlphotos@hort.net and they will
show up at: http://www.hort.net/lists/gwlphotos
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index