This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Genes Run Wild
A new report commissioned by the U.S. Department of Agriculture from the
National Research Council - part of the U.S.'s National Academies (of Sciences,
Engineering and Medicine) warns of what it calls serious ecological risks of
some GM plants and animals. More on the report here:
http://www4.nas.edu/cp.nsf/Projects+_by+_PIN/BLSX-K-01-10-A?OpenDocument
---
Genes Run Wild
http://www.sciencentral.com/
A report today from the National Research Council warns of what it calls
serious ecological risks of some genetically modified plants and animals.
As this ScienCentral News video reports, it says there is no 100 percent
effective way to prevent some introduced genes from running out of control in the
wild. [see video at
http://www.sciencentral.com/articles/view.php3?language=english&type=article&article_id=218392157]
Bioconfinement
When the nation's first genetically modified pet, the GloFish, recently came
on the market, it caused more than a small ripple in the scientific ocean.
The fish glow under ultra-violet light because scientists gave them a gene
from an entirely different species, sea coral. Experts say these "transgenic"
organisms are less fit than their wild relatives, so they'd likely pose no
threat to the environment if they got away. But there are organisms that are given
genes that might increase their fitness, such as genetically modified salmon
that grow faster than normal. Would they compete with their natural cousins? Do
they pose any danger? These are questions some scientists have been wondering
about since genetically engineered organisms, or GEOs, were first introduced
into the environment nearly 20 years ago.
A January 20, 2004 report from the National Research Council of the National
Academies, commissioned by the USDA National Biological Risk Assessment
Program, which is considering how it should regulate genetically modified plants and
animals, states that for some GEOs, including modified plants , insects,
microbes and animals, "the ecological consequences" of their escape or release
"could be serious." The report, "Biological Confinement of Genetically Modified
Organisms, " recommends that regulatory agencies require, and enforce, what it
calls "bioconfinement" on a case-by-case basis. It says, "the evaluation of
whether and how to confine a GEO should be an integral part of its development,
and the need for bioconfinement should be considered early in the process."
There are many different methods of bioconfinement, such as making
genetically engineered plants and animals unable to reproduce. "One way is like fighting
fire with fire," says William Muir, professor of animal sciences at Purdue
University. "We will use the transgenic technology to actually introduce genes
that make the organism sterile. If the transgenic organisms are sterile they
can't pass their genes on and if they can't pass their genes on then they cannot
persist in the environment." For example, Muir's lab engineers fish to be
sterile, unless they are fed certain hormones during breeding. "If it got loose,
it could not get these compounds in the wild and therefore it would always
remain infertile," Muir says.
The report also says that "it is unlikely that any single bioconfinement
technique will be completely effective," which means that fail-safe backups would
be necessary. "You can stack these genes one behind the other in case one
failsa new mutation comes along and it becomes fertileyou have a backup gene
that stops it," says Muir. "So we can actually use this technology to greatly
reduce risks."
Muir hopes that using genetic engineering to make genetic engineering safer
will spur more public acceptance of its products. But the report concludes that
bolstering public confidence will come with the success of confinement
methods that are developed as a result of more research, because the current lack of
data limits proper assessment of current methods.
-----------------------
SUBSCRIPTIONS
-----------------------
subscribe
http://www.gmwatch.org/sub.asp
unsubscribe
see end of this message
archive
http://www.gmwatch.org/archive.asp
website
http://www.gmwatch.org
communications
ngin@gmwatch.org
donations to 'NGIN'
NGIN, 26 Pottergate, Norwich, NR2 1DX, UK
or e-mail for details: ngin@gmwatch.org
_______________________________________________
gardenwriters mailing list
gardenwriters@lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/gardenwriters
GWL has searchable archives at:
http://www.hort.net/lists/gardenwriters
Send photos for GWL to gwlphotos@hort.net to be posted
at: http://www.hort.net/lists/gwlphotos
Post gardening questions/threads to
"Organic-Gardening" <organic-gardening@lists.ibiblio.org>
For GWL website and Wiki, go to
http://www.ibiblio.org/gardenwriters
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index