This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under GDPR Article 89.

Re: A Potential Problem?

Jeff -- I couldn't agree more. This year All-America Selections' images came on a disk, complete with a PowerPoint program, which I will not be able to use.

The evaluations of garden-related talks with PowerPoint presentations tend to be less positive than ones given the old fashion way with 35mm slide projectors.

The complaint: too much information and no clear notion of what to pay attention to. For example, on many PowerPoints you have the image of a plant, frequently with text, on the screen and the speaker speaking. Then there's that handout. What do you write down? What's on the screen? What's being said? Something else?

And, you are right. The color of images in PowerPoint presentations is very weak compared to slides.

jems




In the past six months, at least three sources of 35mm slides of new
plants dried up. Ball Seed, Darwin, and recently Netherland Bulb
Information Center. They say that all the images are available in
various qualities on their web site. They suggest that if someone needs
35mm slides, the garden writer can take the electronic image to a
service bureau and pay to make the 35mm slide; so the garden writer is
going to spend an extra $10 or $20 for a talk that earns only $200? I
don't think so.
I don't know how many garden writers in this country make presentations
with 35mm slides, but I suspect it is a goodly number. I also suspect
that few garden writers are using Power Point for presentations, first
because the projectors are still too expensive and secondly because the
color quality of the projected image sucks.
Now at this stage, losing those three sources is not critical in my
view. Lots of companies like Monrovia, Spring Meadow, are Proven
Winners are real helpful in providing slides for use in programs by
garden writers. Most garden writers giving programs probably take some
of those slides themselves, but having access to a professional quality
shot of a new variety is valuable.
I believe that in those companies changing their policy, some accountant
decided that if the image is available on the web site, why spend the
extra money; good accountant type thinking. I assume the PR firms are
very aware of the value of having 35mm slides available, but maybe under
fiscal pressures, the execs in the grower companies are looking for
every penny to save.
In the long run, I don't think cutting off 35mm images is an economic
benefit. I hope this turns into a trend.
Jeff Ball



_______________________________________________
gardenwriters mailing list
gardenwriters@lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/gardenwriters

GWL has searchable archives at:
http://www.hort.net/lists/gardenwriters

Send photos for GWL to gwlphotos@hort.net to be posted
at: http://www.hort.net/lists/gwlphotos

Post gardening questions/threads to
"Gardenwriters on Gardening" <gwl-g@lists.ibiblio.org>

For GWL website and Wiki, go to
http://www.ibiblio.org/gardenwriters

--
Jo Ellen Meyers Sharp
Garden writer, speaker, photographer
Director, Region III Garden Writers Association
Phone: 317.251.3261
Fax: 317.251.8545
E-mail: hoosiergardener@earthlink.net
_______________________________________________
gardenwriters mailing list
gardenwriters@lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/gardenwriters

GWL has searchable archives at:
http://www.hort.net/lists/gardenwriters

Send photos for GWL to gwlphotos@hort.net to be posted
at: http://www.hort.net/lists/gwlphotos

Post gardening questions/threads to
"Gardenwriters on Gardening" <gwl-g@lists.ibiblio.org>

For GWL website and Wiki, go to
http://www.ibiblio.org/gardenwriters
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index