This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: Compost
But this is not a case of haphazard compost making but of not making
compost surely? I presume what happened was that this was ramiel
chippings with a high level of nitrogen and the plants were killed by
nitrogen release if it happened so quickly. I've seen this happen
myself when someone, in my absence, took chippings from a pile that
had been recently built and stacked to compost but was barely started
into it. They used a shovel and never realised that the mulch they
were spreading was literally hot. But that's a different situation
from ramshackle composting which to my mind simply means that you are
relying on slow acting micro organisms and more time
Kathryn
On 15 Jan 2008, at 14:17, frielster@aol.com wrote:
>
> I beg to differ re the need to be picky about composts if applying
> them to soil. We killed or crippled hundreds of plants at a trial
> garden one year by applying insufficiently-composted hardwood
> mulch. I took pictures in the morning of lovely flowering
> perennials, and returned in the afternoon to a scene of slaughter.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Miranda Smith <mirandaconstance@gmail.com>
> To: Garden Writers -- GWL -- The Garden Writers Forum
> <gardenwriters@lists.ibiblio.org>
> Sent: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 9:10 am
> Subject: Re: [GWL] Compost
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> We were working with Woods End Lab --
> http://woodsend.org/pdf-files/Analysis_overview.pdf -- and put the
> composts
> through their analysis. Please follow the link to see what they
> test--I
> can't say enough good things about this lab. If you are interested in
> learning about your composts, they are invaluable.
>
> In short, our well-constructed and well-tended piles had a more
> balanced
> nutrient content, higher OM content, and became biologically stable
> much
> earlier than the haphazard ones. I have no idea what happened to
> our test
> results, but it was clear that quality was influenced by initial
> ingredients
> and technique. The Composting Council
> http://www.compostingcouncil.org/section.cfm?id=39 has a fair
> amount of
> information about quality, too. And, Cornell has great composting
> information: http://compost.css.cornell.edu/Compost_Resources.html .
>
> Naturally, my orientation is towards farm-scale composting. That's
> hardly
> relevant to gardeners, unless they are buying composts, in which
> case, it's
> REALLY relevant. I have had some unfortunate experiences in this
> regard--one
> year, a well-respected dairy farm/commercial compost operation sold an
> organic potting soil made with a compost that was still so active
> that it
> killed most of the seeds planted in it. Scores of farmers were
> affected--it
> put a lot of people behind on their starting schedules. The silver
> lining
> was that we all became much more aware of compost quality.
>
> I agree that you don't need to be picky about composts if you are
> applying
> them to soil; it's when they are the major ingredient in a potting
> mix or
> you are using them to suppress plant pathogens that you want to
> take care.
> For those reasons, it's worthwhile to educate readers--let them
> know that
> different composts have different uses; as long as the compost is
> appropriate to the use, you can't go wrong.
>
> Miranda
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 15, 2008 7:36 AM, Lee Reich <garden@leereich.com> wrote:
>
>> What kind of "testing" did you do to see the differences in your
>> composts? And was the only difference imposed in curing time?
>>
>> Lee Reich, PhD
>> http://leereich.com/
>>
>> Books by Lee Reich:
>> The Pruning Book
>> Weedless Gardening
>> Uncommon Fruits for Every Garden
>> A Northeast Gardener's Year
>>
>>
>> On Jan 14, 2008, at 12:07 PM, Miranda Smith wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Yes, the way that you compost determines the quality of the finished
>>> project. I've done enough research, complete with testing all the
>>> way
>>> through and at the time that it was stockpiled for curing, 3 months
>>> after
>>> that time, and 6 months after that, to know that is so--the
>>> "formal" way,
>>> with or without composters in tuxedos and tiaras, gives the highest
>>> quality
>>> product.
>>>
>>> But there is a huge caveat. Unless you are using the compost as a
>>> disease
>>> suppressant, in greenhouse containers or starting mixes, or
>>> composting
>>> something smelly in a suburban environment, does improved quality
>>> matter
>>> enough to inspire you to monitor the piles every day and adjust
>>> accordingly?
>>> I don't think so. For ordinary uses, sloppy compost works fine--as
>>> long as
>>> it's really broken down. And you can tell that with a simple "cress
>>> test."
>>> Before you buy compost, do a cress test with it: take a sample,
>>> plant land
>>> cress in it--no additives like peat moss or vermiculite--and see
>>> how they
>>> do. If they are fine, you can use it in starting mixes. If not, you
>>> know
>>> that it requires a few more months of curing before it is safe to
>>> use for
>>> sensitive applications.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Miranda
>>>
>>> On Jan 14, 2008 11:37 AM, <loisdan@juno.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Last week I posted a piece to my blog on troublefree composting.
>>>> Out of
>>>> curiosity, I browsed several GWL member sites to see what you all
>>>> have to
>>>> say on the topic. Of those I read, while most gave at least an
>>>> obligatory
>>>> nod to the "rules" of composting, nearly everyone seemed to use
>>>> some type
>>>> of desultory method similar to my own. What say you? Do any of you
>>>> compost only by the rules? It might be an interesting exercise for
>>>> us to
>>>> discuss whether formal composting actually has much effect on the
>>>> final
>>>> product.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Lois
>>>> Visit http://loisdevries.blogspot.com
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> gardenwriters mailing list
>>>> gardenwriters@lists.ibiblio.org
>>>> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/gardenwriters
>>>>
>>>> GWL has searchable archives at:
>>>> http://www.hort.net/lists/gardenwriters
>>>>
>>>> Send photos for GWL to gwlphotos@hort.net to be posted
>>>> at: http://www.hort.net/lists/gwlphotos
>>>>
>>>> Post gardening questions/threads to
>>>> "Gardenwriters on Gardening" <gwl-
>>>> g@lists.ibiblio.org>
>>>>
>>>> For GWL website and Wiki, go to
>>>> http://www.ibiblio.org/gardenwriters
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gardenwriters mailing list
>>> gardenwriters@lists.ibiblio.org
>>> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/gardenwriters
>>>
>>> GWL has searchable archives at:
>>> http://www.hort.net/lists/gardenwriters
>>>
>>> Send photos for GWL to gwlphotos@hort.net to be posted
>>> at: http://www.hort.net/lists/gwlphotos
>>>
>>> Post gardening questions/threads to
>>> "Gardenwriters on Gardening" <gwl-g@lists.ibiblio.org>
>>>
>>> For GWL website and Wiki, go to
>>> http://www.ibiblio.org/gardenwriters
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gardenwriters mailing list
>> gardenwriters@lists.ibiblio.org
>> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/gardenwriters
>>
>> GWL has searchable archives at:
>> http://www.hort.net/lists/gardenwriters
>>
>> Send photos for GWL to gwlphotos@hort.net to be posted
>> at: http://www.hort.net/lists/gwlphotos
>>
>> Post gardening questions/threads to
>> "Gardenwriters on Gardening" <gwl-g@lists.ibiblio.org>
>>
>> For GWL website and Wiki, go to
>> http://www.ibiblio.org/gardenwriters
>>
> _______________________________________________
> gardenwriters mailing list
> gardenwriters@lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/gardenwriters
>
> GWL has searchable archives at:
> http://www.hort.net/lists/gardenwriters
>
> Send photos for GWL to gwlphotos@hort.net to be posted
> at: http://www.hort.net/lists/gwlphotos
>
> Post gardening questions/threads to
> "Gardenwriters on Gardening" <gwl-g@lists.ibiblio.org>
>
> For GWL website and Wiki, go to
> http://www.ibiblio.org/gardenwriters
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> __
> More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! - http://
> webmail.aol.com
> _______________________________________________
> gardenwriters mailing list
> gardenwriters@lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/gardenwriters
>
> GWL has searchable archives at:
> http://www.hort.net/lists/gardenwriters
>
> Send photos for GWL to gwlphotos@hort.net to be posted
> at: http://www.hort.net/lists/gwlphotos
>
> Post gardening questions/threads to
> "Gardenwriters on Gardening" <gwl-g@lists.ibiblio.org>
>
> For GWL website and Wiki, go to
> http://www.ibiblio.org/gardenwriters
>
_______________________________________________
gardenwriters mailing list
gardenwriters@lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/gardenwriters
GWL has searchable archives at:
http://www.hort.net/lists/gardenwriters
Send photos for GWL to gwlphotos@hort.net to be posted
at: http://www.hort.net/lists/gwlphotos
Post gardening questions/threads to
"Gardenwriters on Gardening" <gwl-g@lists.ibiblio.org>
For GWL website and Wiki, go to
http://www.ibiblio.org/gardenwriters
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index