RE: B1 vs Superthrive
- Subject: RE: [GWL] B1 vs Superthrive
- From: "Jeff Lowenfels" jeff@gardener.com>
- Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 10:41:14 -0700
- Importance: Normal
- List-archive: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/private/gardenwriters/>
Linda, I don't want
to beat a dead horse, but if you had just used water....or water with fertilizer
you probably would have had the same results. Science requires a real
test....with controls and, IMHO, we as "media" folks need to know
what we are telling people to use and that it REALLY works.
Superthrive has a cute label, but there are NO test results. There are NO
ingrediants listed.
It used to be good
enough for garden communicators to pass on things that worked for them. I don't
believe it is now. We have to be a bit more responsible and do the testing
others won't. Again, IMHO. The world has changed from the days we automatically
accepted what the literature they send with a product
says.....
Cheers,
Jeff
L
- Follow-Ups:
- Pittsburgh
- From: D* G*
- From: D* G*
- Pittsburgh
- References:
- B1 vs Superthrive
- From: "L* S*"
- From: "L* S*"
- B1 vs Superthrive
- Prev by Date: Introduce Yerself (Right On!)
- Next by Date: Re: B1
- Previous by thread: B1 vs Superthrive
- Next by thread: Pittsburgh