Pressurized timbers
- Subject: [GWL] Pressurized timbers
- From: C* H* <c*@sentex.net>
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:34:01 -0500
- List-archive: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/private/gardenwriters>
Apologies for jumping in late on this, but I wanted to check some references and discovered my filing was even further behind than I thought. I've been following the pressure-treat question for years. The best places to get accurate, scientific information on the subject that I've found are the websites of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the U.S. and the Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) of Health Canada in Canada. The two agencies are cooperating on a reevaluation of Chromated Copper Arsenate (CCA) treated wood. It is a long, painfully slow process and they have missed all their previously-announced completion dates. You will have to wade through a lot of bureaucratese and chemical terms to get the facts. The whole thing cries out for executive summaries. Here's a short history of the recent events:
2001: Health Canada fact sheet says PMRA and EPA are cooperating to reevaluate CCA. Target completion date: 2002.
CCA wood cannot be used in contact with drinking water, cannot be burned. CCA solutions are not available to the general public, only trained commercial or industrial users. Enhanced consumer information will be implemented ASAP, target spring of 2002.
A Globe & Mail article says CCA has been banned in Switzerland, Vietnam and Indonesia, and restricted in Japan, Denmark, Sweden, Germany, Australia and New Zealand.
There are reports of a family burning CCA wood for heat who suffered blackouts, seizures, hair loss, dead plants and fish. Also 22 cows killed in Minnesota when a farmer spread ashes on a field where they grazed. Also a scientist in California who says arsenic from CCA wood stunts plant growth and turns leaves yellow.
2002: EPA announces on Feb. 12 a voluntary decision by industry to phase out pressure treat containing arsenic in favour of new alternatives by Dec. 31, 2003. EPA will not allow CCA for residential use by Jan. 2004. New labels will be required on all CCA products during 2003, specifying that no use is allowed for residential uses after Dec. 31, 2003.
2003: In January there is a report in the Globe & Mail that an environmental group has tested playgrounds across Canada and found they are severely contaminated with arsenic leaching from play equipment made from treated wood. More than half of 60 playgrounds in 7 major Canadian cities had arsenic concentrations exceeding federal guidelines, some by huge amounts. There is a general hue and cry by parents, and many municipalities replace old wooden playground equipment with plastic or metal. Remediation also involves replacing contaminated sand or soil under equipment.
In June the PMRA releases a new fact sheet on CCA wood. Target date for completion of reevaluation: late 2003. The fact sheet announces the voluntary withdrawal of CCA wood for residential applications by the end of 2003. It is still available for industrial use. There is a list of alternative products still registered, which don't sound much better. The amount and rate of leaching from CCA wood depends on the wood species, amount of rain, pH of rain, soil type, age of structure. The reevaluation includes an assessment of the risks to children. The PMRA says you don't need to remove CCA wood but you may want to coat it with a penetrating stain, which slows down the leaching. You shouldn't use deck wash or bleach on CCA wood because it speeds up the leaching.
2004: Received a PMRA update yesterday (Mar.17/04) stating EPA has released preliminary occupational and environmental risk assessments for CCA , directing people to US website http://cascade.epa.gov/RightSite/dk_public_home.htm. It took me a couple of tries to make that work, and I have not yet waded through all the documents there. There is a 60 day comment period, at least in Canada. The update also says a preliminary risk assessment on children's exposure was released in November 2003 and is in the process of being finalized.
If you've stayed with me this far, here's my understanding of the practical advice on CCA wood:
It's water soluble, and it leaches. It should never be used in a marine environment (they're evaluating the hazards to freshwater and marine ecosystems, too). It should never be used in contact with human or animal food (don't put food on that pressure-treat picnic table). Don't build raised beds for edible plants out of it. Don't plant crops next to your pressure-treat fence. Arsenic supposedly does not travel far in the soil, but I haven't found a definition of "far" in this context, and it obviously varies with site conditions. I remember seeing something years ago that said the toxins accumulated mostly in root crops, including carrots, less so in leaves, less in fruit.
There are a lot of concerns regarding children, because their bodies are smaller, immune systems less developed, and they put their hands in their mouths. The green coating can rub off the wood.
The worst thing you can do is to burn pressure-treated wood, because the smoke and the ash are highly toxic, and can travel. If you must handle CCA wood, you must wear goggles, gloves, and a dust mask. Don't inhale the sawdust. Wash your hands before you eat, smoke or drink. Wash your clothes before you wear them again, and wash them separately from other clothes. Clean up all the sawdust. As far as I know, municipal dumps are still accepting old pressure treated wood, although I was taught in my landscape construction classes years ago that it is toxic waste and should be disposed of separately. It shouldn't need saying, but don't compost sawdust or wood scraps.
That's my summary of where it stands now. Hope this helps. I have put my new kitchen garden in the middle of my backyard to keep it away from my neighbours' pressure treat structures. The existing deck in our yard is painted with penetrating stain, and will eventually be removed. (I'm planning to do it soon, while I can still get rid of the thing.) All of you that built your garden structures from cedar can rest easy.
Oh, one more thing: creosote and pentachlorophenol are also being reevaluated.
Carol Hughes
_______________________________________________ gardenwriters mailing list gardenwriters@lists.ibiblio.org http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/gardenwriters
GWL has searchable archives at: http://www.hort.net/lists/gardenwriters
Send photos for GWL to gwlphotos@hort.net to be posted at: http://www.hort.net/lists/gwlphotos
Post gardening questions/threads to "Organic-Gardening" <organic-gardening@lists.ibiblio.org>
For GWL website and Wiki, go to http://www.ibiblio.org/gardenwriters
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Pressurized timbers
- From: T* V* O* &*
- RE: Pressurized timbers
- Prev by Date: Bios - Both Writing and Editing
- Next by Date: RE: Pressurized timbers
- Previous by thread: Re: Pressurized timbers
- Next by thread: RE: Pressurized timbers