This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
[GWL]: Query Openings
Nan Sterman wrote:
> I am always torn between a) opening a query with the normal
> pleasantries and saying "I have a story in mind that I would like you
> to consider" (or something like that) before launching in to the
> opening paragraph, and b) skipping the pleasantries and launching
> right into the opening paragraph. It strikes me as odd to leave out
> the pleasaantries and lauch direcltly into the article,
Nan -- A good bit of this is just a matter of personal preferences, and
there are lots of ways that work. Here are a few thoughts about it.
I wouldn't start with "I have a story in mind that I would like you to
consider," because that is obvious. Also, "that I would like you to
consider" seems a bit weak to me. I usually end a query with a one-line
paragraph such as "What do you think?" This ending achieves the same
thing as the "story that I would like you to consider" at the beginning,
but is stronger. It asks not just for consideration, but response. I
don't usually waste time on pleasantries at the beginning beyond "Dear
xxx," unless I know the editor personally. (And when I know the editor
personally or have already written for him, I don't normally write
queries; I pitch the letter over the phone.)
I view a query as a business communication. It's fine if it starts
right in on the subject of interest. I think that getting right to the
point and including exactly what is relevant is one way I can
demonstrate writing ability and professionalism. I also figure that the
shorter a query is, the more likely the editor reads the whole thing in
one gulp, instead of reading it line by line, looking for a place to
quit the whole way. When possible, I like my queries to be a single
page or less.
There isn't one best way to start all queries. There are better and
worse ways to start specific queries.
I think we usually will want to start with a paragraph that is as strong
as possible. Every editor is ready to quit reading after every
sentence. "You don't have to eat all of a rotten apple in order to know
it's rotten," say most editors, and they mean it. It is their job to
get rid of the "nonwinners" as efficiently as possible so as to focus on
the "winners." This means reading as little as possible of most queries
before rejecting. So I want a query to start with the strengths and
finish with (and deemphasize) weaknesses.
When you're starting out, you usually have no credits that are going to
impress an editor very much; so the bio/writerly-credit info will be a
short paragraph near the end of the query, very carefully deemphasized.
On the other hand, if you have major credits, you might start a query
with a few lines of bio. When who you are is enough to guarantee your
query will be read, starting with who you are makes sense. If you are a
superfamous person, the same applies.
When you have unique material or new facts, or the proposed story is
based upon your own original field or plant research, that might make
the strongest opening paragraph. "For the last 50 years I have been
studying beetles in gardens."
Starting a query with the lead for the proposed story can be very
powerful if you can think of a good lead without writing the whole story
first. (I usually can't. The lead is usually the last part of the
story I write, not the first.)
Starting with the story idea can work well, especially if it is really
new. Also, if you can think of a great title, you can take advantage of
it by starting your query with the idea/title. This works for me, since
I often think of a good title early in thinking about a piece.
Finally, if it is not obvious why this story is relevant to this
particular market, consider starting with a paragraph that shows the
relevance. Two or three facts, then a sentence or three that shows why
this publications's audience is going to care. In fact, you may HAVE to
start such a query with a paragraph about relevance in order to get the
editor to read beyond the first sentence. Especially if the editor has
just skimmed through and discarded three hundred queries, most by people
who have obviously NEVER read his magazine, half of which are for
fiction or poetry, which he doesn't published.
Hope this helps.
Carol Deppe
Author of BREED YOUR OWN VEGETABLE VARIETIES: THE GARDENER'S AND
FARMER'S GUIDE TO PLANT BREEDING AND SEED SAVING (See table of contents,
excerpts, & reviews at http://www.chelseagreen.com.)
============================================================
Imagine-Your-Name-Here.com Wouldnt it be great to have your
own personalized Domain Name? New Domains & Transfers $8.95/yr
& lower. GoDaddy.com is an ICANN ACCREDITED registrar. ACT NOW!
http://click.topica.com/caaadtybUrGSSbVSZwBf/GoDaddy
============================================================
Pass the word to garden writers, editors publishers, horticultural businesses about our list.
==^================================================================
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrGSS.bVSZwB
Or send an email To: Gardenwriters-unsubscribe@topica.com
This email was sent to: topica.com@spamfodder.com
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index