hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive


Thanks Kevin,

I have to admit that rules irritate me, but in this case I asked for it so I have only myself to blame.

The reason I'm asking is that I am not a big fan of naming, nor or registering, streaked plants unless they are truly unusual and outstanding for some reason. Obviously there are many who disagree because I see all kinds of plants being named that don't look any different than the hundreds of streaked plants I produce every year - thousands if you count the ones I throw out. I can't see any reason to introduce a streaked plant unless it's an outstanding breeder, and that doesn't mean just any streaked plant that will produce additional ordinary streaked plants.

Anyway, I digress (does it seem that there's always a rant attached to my questions?). I do have some streaked plants that I consider outstanding breeders and I have considered offering them for sale in the future. Generally I number the seedlings I use for breeding and don't give them a name unless they stabilize into something I find interesting. I think I was once told that I could not name a plant 'Bridgewood 0017 ' legally because it didn't conform to the rules. It would seem to me that if 'Apolo 13' is legal, then 'Bridgewood 0017' would be too. Yes?


Giboshiman@aol.com wrote:

In a message dated 8/28/2004 2:36:19 PM Eastern Standard Time, chick@bridgewoodgardens.com writes:

Actually, I'm not bored.  Does it say anywhere in there whether  digits
are allowed in hosta names?  That's really all I was wondering  about.


Chick I know it scares you when I send anything that relates to rules but in this case I think you will like the answer I am giving you to your question!

The relevant sections ("articles") of the 2004 version of the code follow:

19.15 For a cultivar name to be established on or after 1 January 1996, its epithet must consist of no more than 30 characters (Roman letters, numbers, and permitted punctuation marks or symbols) overall, excluding spaces and the demarcating marks. Ex. 24. After 1 January 1996 a name with the cultivar epithet "Madame la Comtesse Oswald de Kerchove de Denterghem" could not be established.

19.16. A cultivar name may not be established if on or after 1 January 2004 its epithet consists solely of a single letter or solely of Arabic or Roman numerals. Ex. 25. Names containing the epithets "K", "400", and "MMIV" cannot be established, but the epithets "Hundred", "10 Downing Street", "451 Ocean Boulevard", "77 Sunset Strip", "Apollo 13", "Catch 22", "Henry VIII", "Pope Leo X", "4th July", and "Happy 21st Birthday" could be established.

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

--------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE HOSTA-OPEN

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index