hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Plagiarism Story Part III

> Robins,
> It is important to understand the genesis of the Wheel Concept to
> understand the plagiarism story. It all began in the spring of 1995.
> After the concept of the modified Benedict Cross was rather well
> defined, I discussed it in detail with Alex Summers in the summer of
> 1995. As a result of our discussions, he wrote two short articles in
> Journal Vol 26.2, "Why So Many Sports" and "Thoughts on the Benedict
> Cross". I wrote in the same edition "Clans of Sporting Clones". Neither
> of us knew the other was writing on the subject. I suggest readers go to
> these three articles for a good historical background of understanding.
> Soon after, in October 1995, I wrote the following to the Scientific
> Exchange Robin as my letter of contribution:
>    "For this letter go-around I thought I would share with readers
> something I have been working on regarding sports. I have become
> fascinated with the subject as you can imagine. "Clans of Sporting
> Clones" in the fall edition of the Journal (which should be arrivng any
> day now, I hope) gives an overview and my opinions on the subject.. In
> addition, since I am scheduled to give a talk on this subject at the
> winter meeting of the DEMARVA Hosta Group , I have been digging for facts
> on plastids that are the basis for  the phenomenon of sports in hostas.
> While conducting these inquiries, a few additional ideas presented
> themselves like an Edison  light bulb. Among them is the concept that if
> one superimposes a circle over a Benedict Cross, this format serves as a
> graphic pattern to use in determining the correct location of a given
> sport in relation to other sports in its "clan". The location is based
> upon its color as determined by its plastid mixture endowment. Jim
> Wilkins calls it the Hosta Enneagram but this assumes that there are
> only nine types of sports in a clan (ennea in Greek means nine). But as
> you will see from examples given later, there can be more than nine
> sports in some clans.
> I have been calling the graphic pattern an "Artist's Palette". The
> examples attached show various sports that are derived from a common
> parent plant highlighted in blue".
> ( I attached a copy of 'Clans of Sporting Clones" along with several
> "Wheels" showing related sports.)
> A few weeks later in the fall I was in communication with Warren
> Pollock. He was concerned that I had used the term "clan". He told me
> that this term had been reserved by the Nomenclature people in the ICNCP
> Committee for use in Orchid nomenclature. I was not very concerned about
> this because I had never taken nomenclature as seriously as Warren.
> Besides, I had used "clans of sporting clones"  also as a clever (I
> thought) example of alliteration in the title of the article.
> On March 10, 1996 I wrote a letter to Warren to try to clarify this
> minor conflict. I explained my thinking about the Artist Palette
> concept. I wrote in part:
> "As I studied plastid characteristics during the summer and fall of
> 1995, I came to realize the importance of the numerous possible
> variations in plastid attributes in hosta sports and their impact on
> leaf morphological differences. The Benedict Cross and modifications of
> it developed as I attempted to organize the morphological differences
> into a logical pattern. This resulted in the so-called "Artist Palette"
> concept. I wrote three papers that are inter-related:
>    Clans of Sporting Clones
>    Where do Sports Come From?
>    Using an Artist's Palette to Classify Hosta Sports
> I sent all three of these to you and discussed them briefly with you. I
> am assuming that you have read them  all very critically. I also sent
> these papers to Jim Wilkins, Alex Summers,Van Wade, Pete Ruh, Ran
> Lydell, Clyde Crockett and through the Scientific Exchange Robin letter
> via Kenn Skrupky....
> ...You have questioned the use of the term "clan". My analysis suggests
> that some similar term is still needed. Why? My analysis follows:
>    Grexes defined by Schmid were hybrids of known ,identical parentage,
> with individual plants having almost similar morphology, being similar
> phenotypically  and genotypically.
>    Groups (look-alikes) were understood to be comprised of plants  with
> similar appearancees but not necessarily similar genetically. They could
> be hybrid derivatives of unknown or non-identical parentage. They are
> similar phenotypically but not genotypically.
> A new category appreared to be needed for groups of sports with common
> ancestry but not identical appearance because of their plastid
> endowment. They are similar genotypically but not phenotypically. I used
> "clans of sporting clones" to represent these "groups of related
> sports".
> A fourth much larger group is represented by all other species and
> cultivars which have not yet sported. They are not similar , either
> genotypically or phenotypically."
> I gave Warren what I considered the criteria for the third group
> described as "clans of sporting clones:" or "groups of related
> sports"...."the term should represent the definition of a group of
> plants, propagated asexually, derived from a common progenitor,
> demonstrating temporary or permanent chimeral changes or reversions
> from  chimeral forms to monocolored forms. Since they arise from plastid
> mutations, they are morphologically variable, perhaps possessing many
> color forms due to their plastid endowment."
> This criteria in the correspondence to Pollock  was provided to the
> Registrar on another occasion but his comment was..."I did not find your
> letter to Warren Pollock particularly revealing as to your intent
> (concerning the Wheel Concept)".
> What I have tried to demonstrate in this series of comments within
> communications was that the concept of sports derived from a common
> progeniotor, and as described in a graphic format and based upon plastid
> types, populations and distribution was an original creation in my
> opinion. I had acknowledged other group types mentioned by others, such
> as Schmid who had described the  Tiara "series". I have never claimed to
> be the first to use the term "group". I am the first to use "Clans of
> Sporting Clones", "Groups  of Related Sports", Modified Benedict Cross
> and similar terms to describe groups of sports under the criteria
> described in the correspondence to Warren Pollock mentioned above. The
> purpose of this discription is simply to establish these historical
> facts about the genesis of the Sport Groups as I have used and named
> them beginning in mid 1995.
> Respectfully,
> Jim Hawes

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index