Re: Bap 10

---

• To:
• Subject: Re: Bap 10
• From: B* A*
• Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 19:01:37 -0600
• References: <002d01bf676d$67edd800$50871ed0@seabeth.heart.net> <04cb01bf6778$9fefe9e0$1aabfea9@winterberry>

On the above subject, lets start with a relatively simple term.  His
statement "response to BA application was cultivar-dependent".  Have I taken
this out of context or is this supposed to tell me something.  I really feel
like I am sticking my neck out here, like am I supposed to understand that
statement?  Explain in laymens terms please.
Beth

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE HOSTA-OPEN

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Bap 10
    • From: "J* M* A*"

• References:
  • Bap 10
    • From: "B* A*"
  • Re: Bap 10
    • From: "J* M* A*"

• Prev by Date: Re: Incase someone wants to start a name of Hosta series with Gogh (like Van Gogh)
• Next by Date: Re: Captain Kirk
• Prev by thread: Re: Bap 10
• Next by thread: Re: Bap 10