hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Etera

  • Subject: Re: Etera
  • From: BBROWNJ@aol.com
  • Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 16:03:33 EDT

<<Maybe their real problem is small, poorly-grown plants of older varieties.
I never bought an Etera plant. They were never half as good as most of the
stuff from other growers.>>

AT the Nursery where I work we sell a lot of Itera and they looked very good.
I do agree with the older varieties comment though. I bought 2 and both are
doing well. I really prefer the real pot grown ones instead of Itera's
cocoanut fiber pots.


 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index