scientific?

When I publish about new data there are two ways to do it 

1. I publish in a scientific journal like Current Genetics, 
Developmental genetics Euphytica etcThese articles have all the 
proper proofs methods and references.
2. Some observations are to small to be published in a journal or are 
not new in the sense that they are just applications of knowledge to 
another field.or are compilations or abstracts of my earlier 
scientific pulications
 This .information I publish in hobbyist journals like 
those on Sedum. Sempervivum , Epiphytyes, Succulenta Piante Grasse Br 
cactus and succ j. Alpine garden society ,American english and 
dutch hosta journals etc As these are for the general public I leave 
out all matters that clutter the main message as this would make it 
incomprehensible Therfore there, no methods are given and 
graphes or other hard proofs, references and notes and exceptions are 
kept to a minimum. If you want examples It is more like the style in 
informative articles in most hobbyist journals and also a bit like 
Scientific American. So there are two ways to do a write up The fact 
that a  publication is about " scientific subjects" does not mean 
that one should adhere to all the rules that apply to publications in 
a scientific journal. It is just a different style. PS I wonder, how 
many will find something negative in the above this time.
Ben J.M.Zonneveld
Clusius lab pobox 9505
2300 RA Leiden
The Netherlands
Zonneveld@RULbim.LeidenUniv.NL
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE HOSTA-OPEN
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index