Re: Hostas in sun; Convention
- To: hosta-open@mallorn.com
- Subject: Re: Hostas in sun; Convention
- From: R* <r*@netsync.net>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 07:53:58 -0400
- References: <6751b751.24ab00b8@aol.com>
CCREDUX@aol.com wrote:
>
Was a vote then taken on the main motion, which required
> a 2/3 majority?
> If so, was it a voice vote?
**********
Clyde it is hard to remember all the details, but a motion to table the
vote on the Bi-laws changes, wes brought to the floor and seconded. It
was defeted, but I think it was by a non counted vote.
Ran
>
> The most terrible thing about the procedure was that the motion to table was
> ruled out of order. I repeat===A motion to table is NEVER out of order, is
> not debatable and a vote must be taken. Simple majority is req'd.
>
> Clyde Crockett z5
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
> message text UNSUBSCRIBE HOSTA-OPEN
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE HOSTA-OPEN
