Re: advanced engineering
- To: C*@aol.com, D*@aol.com, B*@aol.com, B*@aol.com, M*@aol.com, hosta-open@mallorn.com, L*@aol.com
- Subject: Re: advanced engineering
- From: S*@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 07:59:20 EST
> > Here is a look into the corporate mind that is very
interesting,
> > educational, historical, completely true, and hysterical
all at the
> > same time:
> >
> > The US standard railroad gauge (width between the two
rails) is 4
> > feet, 8.5 inches. That's an exceedingly odd number. Why
was that gauge
> > used?
> >
> > Because that's the way they built them in England, and the
US
> > railroads were built by English expatriates.
> >
> > Why did the English build them like that? Because the
first rail lines
> > were built by the same people who built the pre-railroad
tramways, and
> > that's the gauge they used.
> >
> > Why did "they" use that gauge then? Because the people who
built the
> > tramways used the same jigs and tools that they used for
building
> > wagons which used that wheel spacing.
> >
> > Okay! Why did the wagons have that particular odd wheel
spacing?
> > Well, if they tried to use any other spacing, the wagon
wheels would
> > break on some of the old, long distance roads in England,
because
> > that's the spacing of the wheel ruts.
> >
> > So who built those old rutted roads? The first long
distance roads in
> > Europe (and England) were built by Imperial Rome for
their legions.
> > The roads have been used ever since. And the ruts in the
roads? Roman
> > war chariots first formed the initial ruts, which everyone
else had to
> > match for fear of destroying their wagon wheels. Since the
chariots
> > were made for (or by) Imperial Rome, they were all alike
in the matter
> > of wheel spacing. The United States standard railroad
gauge of 4
> > feet, 8.5 inches derives from the original specification
for an
> > Imperial Roman war chariot. Specifications and
bureaucracies live
> > forever. So the next time you are handed a specification
and wonder
> > what horse's ass came up with it, you may be exactly
right, because
> > the Imperial Roman war chariots were made just wide enough
to
> > accommodate the back ends of two war horses. Thus, we have
the answer
> > to the original question.
> >
> > Now the twist to the story..............
> >
> > There's an interesting extension to the story about
railroad gauges
> > and horses' behinds. When we see a Space Shuttle sitting
on its launch
> > pad, there are two big booster rockets attached to the
sides of the
> > main fuel tank. These are solid rocket boosters, or SRBs.
The SRBs are
> > made by Thiokol at their factory in Utah. The engineers
who designed
> > the SRBs might have preferred to make them a bit fatter,
but the SRBs
> > had to be shipped by train from the factory to the launch
site. The
> > railroad line from the factory had to run through a tunnel
in the
> > mountains. The SRBs had to fit through that tunnel. The
tunnel is
> > slightly wider than the railroad track, and the railroad
track is
> > about as wide as two horses' behinds. So, the major design
feature of
> > what is arguably the world's most advanced transportation
system was
> > determined over two thousand years ago by the width of a
Horse's Ass!
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE HOSTA-OPEN
- Prev by Date:
Re[2]: $31,680., $47,520., or $115,560. That's a lot of BAP
- Next by Date:
Re: pulmonaria photos
- Prev by thread:
table of contents for the tapes
- Next by thread:
Re[2]: $31,680., $47,520., or $115,560. That's a lot of BAP