hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: New Rules

In a message dated 10/4/1999 9:18:10 PM Central Daylight Time, 
wie1086@mail.harborcom.net writes:

<< Why the push to register
 everything? It just seems completely illogical. >>
 I agree. We shall be flooded with registration of plants. Many of these will 
be unstable; many will be morphologically identical;many will never hit the 
Butch is right ----registration does not have anything to do with a plant's 
worthiness---but, how many consumers know that?

What we need is a Registrar who can make a decision NOT to register a plant.
As I have said before, if I sent a pic of 'Lancifolia', with the 6" ruler, 
and all that info and called it 'Lance Flower', it would be registered.

We, as growers and consumers, do not need the Registrar or the ICNCP.

Clyde Crockett
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index