hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive


No problem adhering to the rules However I still strongly oppose to 
leaving out the species name in those cases where there is no 
doubt about its identity. The AHS strongly adheres to about 20 
hybrids still named as species and now the swing is to the other 
side and all mutants of bonafide species are banned as species. 
This completely blurrs the distinction bewteen species and hybrids 
and cultivars. Just because it is difficult in some cases this is no 
argument to propagate the abandonement of species names.There 
is no problem with a montana Shirofukurin as long it is only used 
once and all other white edged montana's are given a different 
cultivar name That is what is done all the time with plants like 
Patriot etc. If  descriptive names are banned what about Fragrant 
BLue,  Gold Edger etc?
Ben J.M.Zonneveld
Institute of Biology,Leiden University, Clusius lab 
Wassenaarse weg 64, 2333 AL Leiden, The Netherlands
Fax: +31-71-5274999. min temp -10C (15F)

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index