hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: Tattoo

In a message dated 9/21/1999 11:54:24 PM Central Daylight Time, 
halinar@open.org writes:

<< A plant patent is only good IF the owner of the patent enforces the 
 patent.  Patents are not enforced by the government.   >>

That is correct.
The action would arise under the patent laws which give federal courts 
exclusive jurisdiction in patent infringement cases.
One should note that a person who is accused of infringement may bring a 
declaratory judgement action against the patent holder. 28 UCS sec. 2201

This is a very useful device for persons who are threatened with lawsuits, by 
the patent holder, for patent infringement.

 In respect of hostas, I should think that a patent holder would be somewhat 
at a disadvantage to sue someone for patent infringement. Just imagine the 
burden of proof the patent holder would face.

Clyde Crockett z5
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the

 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index