hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: Adobe Acrobat

  • Subject: Re: Adobe Acrobat
  • From: "Laurie AE O'Meara" Laurie@LAEOM.COM
  • Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 16:35:26 -0400

Hi Sandy :)  I for one, thank you for doing all this research.  It's a great
thing to know, as far as which Adobe programs can do what.  Also- I hadn't
tried to save a photo as a pdf through my photo program, and will try that
(just for the curiosity).  I had only tried with my scanner software.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Sandy Connerley" <sandyc@SURFARI.NET>
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:25 PM
Subject: Adobe Acrobat

> Hello,
>     Well, after reading the Adobe Acrobat website and still having
> questions, I called them.  If back issues of GATW were to be scanned so
> the capability of searching for specific words was a feature (a great
> feature!), they recommened we would only need to purchase Adobe Acrobat
> 5.0 at $249. They said the magazines would be as you see them, with
> pictures where they are on the page.  They said the OCR (optical
> character recognition) is very good.  They said if the program is
> ordered on-line or directly through them with the 30 day trial, that if
> it does not work, you can return it, or upgrade to the Adobe Capture
> program.  But, they did not think for IGS purposes that we would need
> the larger program.
>     Thanks, Barry, for alerting us to this possiblity.  Much better than
> scanning images.  Making them searchable is great.
>     They also said that you could put several magazines on one pdf file
> so the search would be for that file, or you could put them in several
> pdf files.
>     Any other thoughts?
> Sandy

 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index