This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: Roses under the apples
- To: <r*@eskimo.com>
- Subject: Re: Roses under the apples
- From: "* A* <d*@msn.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 09:03:26 -0800
- Resent-Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 10:02:19 -0800 (PST)
- Resent-From: rose-list@eskimo.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"ZQq4H1.0.WT2.fw21r"@mx2>
- Resent-Sender: rose-list-request@eskimo.com
-----Original Message-----
From: rosenlund <rosenlund@transport.com>
To: Rose-List <rose-list@eskimo.com>
Date: Friday, March 06, 1998 3:30 PM
Subject: Roses under the apples
>Dave,
><Warning - If you are planning on eating the apples from
><those trees, plants the Gallicas their, and DON'T SPRAY
>
>Are you recommeding that the Gallicas and not the Albas
>can handle the shade of the apple trees? (which are small now)
>or is it because of the tree roots?
>Good point on the tree spray. These roses will have to tolerate
>it or the trees will not be sprayed.
>
>Thanks,
>Carleen
>
>
My message was intended to recommend planting the Gallicas under the apple
trees because the roses planted there should be a variety that does not
require spraying, in other worlds, resistant to the various fungal deseases.
The roses, Albas or otherwise with not have a problem with sprays applied to
the apple tree. My concern is the spraying of edible crops with chemicals in
a concentration or frequency not recommended for food crops.
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index