RE: Subjects vs. content

---

• To: "Rose-List" <r*@eskimo.com>
• Subject: RE: Subjects vs. content
• From: "* <r*@transport.com>
• Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 13:57:16 -0700
• Resent-Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 14:01:44 -0700 (PDT)
• Resent-From: rose-list@eskimo.com
• Resent-Message-ID: <"ivrW92.0.lQ6.tsoQr"@mx2>
• Resent-Sender: rose-list-request@eskimo.com

Sorry, I'm no expert here, but it seems 
logical that the subjects should be general
enought to allow a "reply" responce, yet
specific enought to keep the thoughts 
together. 
I would be interested in DUNCAN's
point of view.

Carleen
----------
> From: Jeaa1224 <Jeaa1224@aol.com>
> To: rose-list@eskimo.com
> Subject: Re: Subjects vs. content
> Date: Tuesday, May 26, 1998 1:17 PM
> 
> Carleen:  Should I create a new subject and not use the reply form on the
mail
>                section of e-mail (ex.: botrytis moving from one perennial
to
> my roses)?
>                

• Prev by Date: Re: Welcome to the world of Roses.
• Next by Date: Re: Welcome to the world of Roses.
• Prev by thread: Re: Subjects vs. content
• Next by thread: Re: Subjects vs. content