This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: Re: rose 'Queen Elizabeth'
- To: rose-list@mallorn.com
- Subject: Re: [Rose-list] Re: rose 'Queen Elizabeth'
- From: J*@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 17:04:32 EDT
- List-Id:
In a message dated 10/04/2001 1:54:09 PM Central Daylight Time,
rpcs30@email.sps.mot.com writes:
<< they were a
delightful, bright pink, cupped, so fragile looking, very stunning. >>
Alan:
This is one type of rose I've always wanted...a cupped one. The only that
threw me was that some had so many petals that I thought they were a bit
blousy looking. How many petals would you guess she has? The pink sounds
wonderful.
There's such an over abundance of newer roses out that I need to go back and
inspect those that were around earlier this century.
Have you any experience with Margo Koster (circa 1940's)? It's a beautiful,
delicate coral, fading to pale pink. I'm having a bit of trouble with
her...she doesn't seem happy anywhere...wonder if it's because I keep moving
her? ;-P
Joanie
_______________________________________________
rose-list maillist - rose-list@mallorn.com
https://secure.mallorn.com/mailman/listinfo/rose-list
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index