This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: Re: rose 'Queen Elizabeth'
- To: rose-list@mallorn.com
- Subject: Re: [Rose-list] Re: rose 'Queen Elizabeth'
- From: Alan Zelhart rpcs30@email.sps.mot.com>
- Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 08:28:21 -0700
- List-Id:
- References: ea.1bdb1d06.28ef1020@aol.com>
Oh, I was going to give you an example of that with the old garden
roses.
I planted Rosarium Ueteresen 3 years ago. The first year it didn't even
grow. The second year, it grew, but only had one or two blooms. This
year it has grown and grown and grown, and bloomed and bloomed and
bloomed. Absolutely stunning rose. I'm glad I was patient with it...it
is going to be a delightful keeper!
-----
Alan Chandler, Arizona Sunset Zone: 13
http://www.gizmoaz.com
Over 187 Roses! Over 114 Different varieties! Never a dull moment!!
Jeaa1224@aol.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 10/04/2001 4:22:15 PM Central Daylight Time,
> rpcs30@email.sps.mot.com writes:
>
> << I've always been told you must let a rose get established for 3 years
> before deciding if she needs moved or is happy, or whatever. >>
>
> If only I could stop rearranging everything...always seem to be reinventing
> the beds, which doesn't necessarily translate into a better idea in the long
> run. ;-P
>
> <<Old garden roses seem to take longer to establish, for me, than the
> newer ones.>>
>
> Good to know...thanks!
>
> Joanie
>
> _______________________________________________
> rose-list maillist - rose-list@mallorn.com
> https://secure.mallorn.com/mailman/listinfo/rose-list
_______________________________________________
rose-list maillist - rose-list@mallorn.com
https://secure.mallorn.com/mailman/listinfo/rose-list
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index