Re: Heirloom Old Garden Roses - was: Why is there so little mail?

---

• To: r*@eskimo.com
• Subject: Re: Heirloom Old Garden Roses - was: Why is there so little mail?
• From: "* J* a* M* L* T* <h*@sonet.net>
• Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 13:56:18 -0600
• Resent-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 11:51:32 -0800
• Resent-From: rose-list@eskimo.com
• Resent-Message-ID: <"sSuiI3.0.Tf2.33FLq"@mx1>
• Resent-Sender: rose-list-request@eskimo.com

At 01:36 PM 10/27/97 -0500, Keith Romanczyk wrote:
>That would be Heirloom Old Garden Roses.  The catalog, as a reference, is
>well worth it.  I happen to like them and have never had a problem. 

How about an address/phone number on this?

Monica L. Tittle  (and sometimes Robert Tittle) hstrynut@sonet.net
ICQ #2120658
To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism; to steal from many is research.

• Prev by Date: Re: Heirloom Roses
• Next by Date: Re: Heirloom Old Garden Roses
• Prev by thread: Heirloom Old Garden Roses - was: Why is there so little mail?
• Next by thread: Re: Heirloom Old Garden Roses - was: Why is there so little mail?