This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: Sans. grandis
- To: S*@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU
- Subject: Re: [SANS] Sans. grandis
- From: Stephen M Jankalski CEREOID@PRODIGY.NET>
- Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 14:00:38 -0400
Dear Hermine,
Please don't color my inquiry as snide or confrontational. That is not my
intent at all. I am truly unsure to which plant Jim is alluding. He has not
made it clear in his posting. I am only asking for a description of his
plant. What harm is there in that?
It has been mentioned several times in this forum that Sansevieria grandis
is nothing more than a renaming of the original Sansevieria hyacinthoides.
The telling of convoluted nomenclatural history of the types species of the
genus would only bore the members of this forum. Several have made it clear
that they have no interest in the history and nomenclature of the plants.
Cereusly Steve
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Subject: Re: [SANS] Sans. grandis
From: the woman formerly known as hermine ð
<hermine@ENDANGEREDSPECIES.COM>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 09:45:26 -0700
------------------------------------------------------------------------
At 09:52 AM 8/2/99 -0400, Stephen M Jankalski wrote:
>Dear Jim,
>
>Thanks for the reply but we still don't know what plant you are actually
>growing under the obsolete name Sansevieria grandis. Could you describe it
>for us? In what other ways is it distinctive? We would like to know what
>you are alluding to.
>
>Why does the fact that you got the plant from Robert Wagner (R.J. from the
>movies?) mean that the plant must be correctly identified?
IS THERE NO END TO SNIDE AND CONFRONTATIONAL POSTINGS????
I am getting seriously tired of this.
hermine
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index