This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under GDPR Article 89.

Re: I.d.'s

>
>I still think that all these suffruticosa type plants should be
>considered at least their own variety since I don't think(I could be
>wrong) that my bally 12681 could start cascading and on a regular basis
>have regular suffruticosa on one stolon, Kenya #1 on another, and so on
>and so forth interchanging at will.  It seems to me that all of these
>are fairly stable and thus is the reason they were given different names
>and thus it seems, their own cv. status.


CERTAINLY you must grow them to some size, flowering notwithstanding, so as
to see them have individual character, as  a group of one kind. for as
children, they many of them do look very much alike, i will grant you that.
loss of label from pot would be a disaster, which is why i bury one label
at the bottom, as well as have one sticking out.

hermine
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index