This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
San. javanica
- To: S*@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU
- Subject: San. javanica
- From: N* L* <C*@AOL.COM>
- Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1998 01:31:50 EST
To All, now I'm confused, please explain, about San. Being classified as
Dracaena,
according to Brown, what is the new classification at this time? I thought
this books was printed in 1915. I know their must have been changes since
then.
John, Juan, Hermine, who ever is listening, are all the other San. considered
Dracaena, at this time? I have a Sans. Javanica also a San. aubrytiana, so
these are phony Sans.? I also have a Sans. liberica, Sans chinensis. Steve,
are these also phony names, regardless of the spelling? You have really
confused me. Steve, are you a new authority? How so? Please explain, thank
you, Norma Lewis
Crasulady@aol.com
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index