This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under GDPR Article 89.

Re: sp. Lavranos 24534

Okay you two, enough teasing already.

This theoretical stuff is certainly entertaining but how about enlightening
us with some specifics?

Don't be afraid to name those free flowering species with paniculate
inflorescences. You know, those species with branched flower stems.

Cereusly Steve

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Subject: Re: [SANS] sp. Lavranos 24534
From: hermine <hermine@ENDANGEREDSPECIES.COM>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2000 17:19:58 -0800

At 05:03 PM 2/7/00 , Juan Chahinian wrote:>HI>
>I agree with Hermine about blooming of the species that have a paniculate
>inflorescence. They are not more difficult to bloom than the average.
>In order to ascertain the opposite one requires to have a sizable number of
>plants, or have observed as many, before arriving to any conclusions.>>Juan

Well, if a plant is difficult to grow, it seems to follow that the
flowering will also be a rare thing, but i have not noticed that plants
with paniculate inflorescences are any harder to grow than the other ones
(upright stick with flowers attached at right  angles sort of) herm
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index