Re: [SANS] plant I.D.

---

• To: S*@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU
• Subject: Re: [SANS] plant I.D.
• From: S* R* <S*@MIXCOM.COM>
• Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 19:49:17 GMT
• In-Reply-To: <392-377FC5DD-644@postoffice-211.iap.bryant.webtv.net>
• References: <392-377FC5DD-644@postoffice-211.iap.bryant.webtv.net>

On Sun, 4 Jul 1999 15:36:45 -0500, you wrote:

>I also notice that there aren't any descriptions for Kirkii giant.
>According to i.d.'s, Kirkii can get quite large.  Is kirkii giant a
>mature form of kirkii kirkii?
>

Tom,

I have several photographs of the kirkii superclone I took
at the Chicago Botanical Gardens.  If you want, I can drop
them in the mail to you.

Stephen
Milw. WI

• References:
  • plant I.D.
    • From: T* &* C* S* &*

• Prev by Date: Re: [SANS] That odd named thing
• Next by Date: More I.d. type stuff
• Prev by thread: Re: [SANS] plant I.D.
• Next by thread: Re: [SANS] Off subject