This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: Sans.grandis rosea
- To: S*@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU
- Subject: Re: [SANS] Sans.grandis rosea
- From: hermine isabel hermine@ENDANGEREDSPECIES.COM>
- Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 16:36:12 -0800
- In-Reply-To: 199911260008.TAA66806@pimout6-int.prodigy.net>
At 07:09 PM 11/25/99 -0500, Stephen M Jankalski wrote:
>Dear Hermine,
>
>The whole Sans.trifasciata 'Lilian True" verses 'Slipped Stripes'
>controversy has been discussed in this forum in detail already. As
>interesting as it is, it doesn't answer Toms original question.
EXCUUUUUUUZE ME
>What Tom was asking is: what is the true identity of "Sansevieria grandis
>var. rosea"? That appears to be something completely different from the
>variegated cultivar Sans.trifasciata 'Lilian True'.
Indeed, it is that!
>Here is the documentation Norma Lewis gave for "Sansevieria grandis var.
>rosea":
>
>Sansevieria sp. HBG #61019 ex Lilian True ex UCBG ex Werner Rauh (cf. Sans.
>grandis var. rosea hort.)
>
>Here is my interpretation of what it all means: the Huntington received it
>from Lilian True, who received it from the University of California
>Botanical Garden, who in turn received it from Werner Rauh in Heidelberg,
>Germany.
well, i gave some of it to Lilian True, in the course of our trading.
a flattish rosette of dark green leaves, with ruffled edges bearing a dried
red edge, seems to remain in an infantile state for a long time. came to me
from Ruth Crane.
hermine
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index