P.S. I should have mentioned that this is a
red-biased film photo of WABASH. The redness in the hafts is not as
perceptible in the garden. -- Griff
----- Original Message -----
From:
j*@cox.net
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 3:04
PM
Subject: Re: [iris-photos] TB: Wild
Vision?
Peggy -- Your iris is probably
WABASH. It is definiftely not WILD VISION. Here is a photo of
WABASH in my garden, brought with me from its Hoosier homeland many decades
ago. WABASH differs from its look-alike, BRIGHT HOUR, in that its style
arms are pure white, not tipped violet, like BH. Other
WABASH look-alikes have rounder falls than WABASH, whose falls are
slightly pinched near the hafts. And yes, WABASH does have purple-based
foliage. -- Griff
----- Original Message -----
From:
O*@msn.com
To: i*@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 10:31
PM
Subject: [iris-photos] TB: Wild
Vision?
Donald posted a photo of an Iris he called Wild Vision not
that long ago. His looked similar to this one in my Iris Collage of the
Iris at the Pinelands Preservation Alliance in Southampton, NJ.
My photo below. Am I possibly right on this one? Is it a TB: Wild
Vision? Peggy in NJ
This MSN Photo E-mail slideshow will be available for 30
days.
To share high quality pictures with your friends and family using
MSN Photo E-mail,
join
MSN.
Photo E-mail 
