iris-photos@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: Re: ID
- From: A*@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:29:06 -0400
PERSNICKETY (Keith Keppel, R. 2008) Sdlg. 00-22E. IB, 26" (66 cm), EML
S. tannish apricot (M&P 12-K-7), faint pinkish flush (12-A-5) in lower center; style arms inca gold (11-J-7); F. lighter tannish-apricot (12-K-6), small amber white (11-BC-1) area at end of beard, raisin (55-J-8) brushed shoulders, haft webbing and fine speckling; beards mandarin orange (11-B-12), redder in throat, white base; plicata. 89-126B, sib to Sneezy, X 98-25G: (Music x Stormy Circle). Keppel 2009.
S. tannish apricot (M&P 12-K-7), faint pinkish flush (12-A-5) in lower center; style arms inca gold (11-J-7); F. lighter tannish-apricot (12-K-6), small amber white (11-BC-1) area at end of beard, raisin (55-J-8) brushed shoulders, haft webbing and fine speckling; beards mandarin orange (11-B-12), redder in throat, white base; plicata. 89-126B, sib to Sneezy, X 98-25G: (Music x Stormy Circle). Keppel 2009.
If this is correct, Sneezy is a relative! ;-)
<<I think it must be Persnickety an '08 >>
Betty W.
KY Zone 6
-----Original Message-----
From: Jean Sturtevant <jms1027@insightbb.com>
To: iris photos@yahoogroups.com <iris-photos@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tue, Apr 27, 2010 6:43 am
Subject: [iris-photos] Re: ID
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index
From: Jean Sturtevant <jms1027@insightbb.com>
To: iris photos@yahoogroups.com <iris-photos@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tue, Apr 27, 2010 6:43 am
Subject: [iris-photos] Re: ID
Colleen:
I think you are right. It is not Sneezy. I think it must be Persnickety an '08 introduction by Keppel. I had it labeled as that but couldn't find it in searching the database/checklist.
Everyone agree? (I hope so!!!). Label "Persnickety" was just a little off in my garden.
This is certainly a persistent group!
Jean
| |||
|

- References:
- Re: ID
- From: "Jean Sturtevant" <jms1027@insightbb.com>
- Re: ID
- Prev by Date: Re: Re: HYB: TB: Immortality X Apollo One
- Next by Date: RE: ID
- Previous by thread: Re: ID
- Next by thread: RE: ID