hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Iris ID's

  • Subject: [iris-photos] Re: Iris ID's
  • From: "lmmunro" <lmmunro@hotmail.com>
  • Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 01:09:53 -0000

    Regarding what you said: it doesn't surprise me that Armour 
Bright may never have been sold or officially introduced; this 
picture is from Presby Gardens, where I understand growers would 
sometimes send their new iris to 'showcase' them to the public. 
Presby has been around for quite a while, and seems to have alot of 
40's, 50's, 60's stuff that no one has ever heard of. Maybe that's 

> Armour Bright seems to be correct. I had it but lost it. Interestly 
>  is a Canadian iris that is listed as having been registered in 1952
> but there are no records that I have been able to find listing it as
> having been sold or officially introduced.
> Babbling Brook and Bengal Tiger seem correct.
> Chuck Chapman, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Send FREE Holiday eCards from Yahoo! Greetings.


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index