hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: TB: Iris Id's part IV

  • Subject: [iris-photos] Re: TB: Iris Id's part IV
  • From: "irischap" <irischapman@netscape.net>
  • Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 00:48:21 -0000

--- In iris-photos@y..., "laetitia munro" <lmmunro@h...> wrote:
> Ok. I got to the end of the B's, with these two shots of something
> different, both claiming to be the SAME thing.
> This is a fairly recent one, BY YOUR LEAVE (1998) so I'm hoping someone 
> might recognize it.
> As you see, the first one is quite attractive, and looks 1998'ish.
> The second one, while I think it's also a pretty iris, doesn't
strike me as 
> that modern. Maybe 80's or even 70's?
> Anyone care to venture a guess?
> Thanks again,
> Laetitia
They both look incorrect according to description and photo in Cooly's
Chuck Chapman

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Send FREE Holiday eCards from Yahoo! Greetings.


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 

 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index