hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Re: Wal Mart Iris

  • Subject: Re: [iris-photos] Re: Wal Mart Iris
  • From: dferguson@cabq.gov
  • Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 10:43:40 -0700

Thanks Bill,

I was thinking about getting a couple of the ones you listed.  Not sure if
the results would be duplicated though (might try it just to find out).
Any idea what the "did nots" are?


 For what it's worth the following irises from the same source bloomed here
 in the following way:

 Batik bloomed true.
 Dover Beach did not.
 Earl of Essex did not.
 Edith Wolford was suspect but may be true.
 Immortality bloomed true and rebloomed.
 I. pallida Variegata grew true.
 Prissy Miss did not.
 Superstition did not.
 Titan's Glory bloomed true.

 Bill Burleson 7a/b
 Old South Iris Society


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index