Re:PHOTO: TB: HUNK (not)
- Subject: [iris-photos] Re:PHOTO: TB: HUNK (not)
- From: &* A* M* <n*@charter.net>
- Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:51:27 -0500
Linda,
I agree. Doesn't match the registration
description. The cv pictured appears to have the *I. pumila* spot, in
which case it is probably an IB, not a TB. It's a very fine looking one at
that, but no "hunk."
Neil Mogensen z 7 western
NC
Yahoo! Groups Links
|
- Prev by Date: Re: Gallent Rogue
- Next by Date: Re: HYB: gray seedling
- Previous by thread: Re: Gallent Rogue
- Next by thread: Re: HYB: gray seedling