hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: photo backgrounds, etc.
  • Subject: Re: photo backgrounds, etc.
  • From: "d7432da" <donald@eastland.net>
  • Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 02:12:22 -0000


Thanks Mike,

That's interesting! Which one is closest to what you see per viewing on your monitor?

I'm not sure what you mean by "photocopying". I'm really abysmally ignorant about a lot of tech stuff. I don't enjoy techy things especially, so only learn the bare minimum to get by. Undoubtedly I'm responsible for much of my frustration.

The whole discussion, though, does raise an interesting point in a similar area. What about the 'official' R&I descriptions? How much leeway are they given? Since blooms are not static, where is the point at which describing it is pinpointed? The 2nd day? Somewhere in the middle of opening and dying? Obviously it's neither practical or possible to provide the progression of the life of the bloom, so how do folks decide?

Donald Eaves
Texas Zone 7b, USA

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement