Re: RE: Ringed regular plicata
- To:
- Subject: Re: [iris-photos] RE: Ringed regular plicata
- From: E* C*
- Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 16:49:55 -0600
I can only comment that it's another terrific looking iris, Paul! It sure
did brighten my day! :)
El, near Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Z3
DIS & MIS Display Garden
-----Original Message-----
From: PAUL BLACK <midamerg@earthlink.net>
To: Photos, Iris <iris-photos@egroups.com>
Date: Saturday, January 06, 2001 4:13 PM
Subject: [iris-photos] RE: Ringed regular plicata
>Here is another picture to maybe help brighten a winter day. This is a
>2001 introduction called Voices. I first thought it was a pumila spot
>plicata on the order of Logo, but the more I looked at it and Logo, the
>more it looks like one of the banded or ringed plicatas. Parentage is
>(Tweety Bird X (Static sib x Wacko) Wacko has that pumila spottish look
>to it, but not as pronounced as Logo. Any comments? It will be
>interesting to see the interaction of the pumila spot + plicata as it
>progresses. Maybe it will be something fun and maybe it will turn out
>to be nothing at all. Haven't had much time for communicating. Work on
>catalog must progress and unlike most of the country, weather has been
>much better than usual here, so real gardening is also underway - YEA!
>
>Paul Black
>Zone 8
>Sunny and mild in Salem Oregon
>
>
>In iris-photos@egroups.com, Chuck Chapman <irischapman@n...>
>
>wrote:
>> Here is a photo of another ringed plicata SDB. This one has regular
>
>plicata
>> rather then the luminata pattern. Note ring on standard and falls
>
>and that the
>> plicata stitching is pushed back from the edge where the ring is.
>
>The pigment
>> in the ring seems to be a dusty-grey pink, although it could be a
>
>pinkish tan.
>
>
>
[PHOTO] RE: Ringed regular plicata