Re: RE: Ringed regular plicata
- To: i*@egroups.com
- Subject: Re: [iris-photos] RE: Ringed regular plicata
- From: K* &* C* C*
- Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2001 23:38:04 -0700
- References: <3A5798A6.92250BC9@earthlink.net>
Hi Paul,
What is the seedling number of Voices---we may have taken
the photos of it and it could get up on our site if we have
it. We are currently working on site photos. Ken has a
cold so is not his jolly self this weekend. But we are
making some progress anyway. We hope you have been having a
good week. Ken passed his anniversary with Qwest 25 years
on Friday.
Carol
PAUL BLACK wrote:
>
> Here is another picture to maybe help brighten a winter day. This is a
> 2001 introduction called Voices. I first thought it was a pumila spot
> plicata on the order of Logo, but the more I looked at it and Logo, the
> more it looks like one of the banded or ringed plicatas. Parentage is
> (Tweety Bird X (Static sib x Wacko) Wacko has that pumila spottish look
> to it, but not as pronounced as Logo. Any comments? It will be
> interesting to see the interaction of the pumila spot + plicata as it
> progresses. Maybe it will be something fun and maybe it will turn out
> to be nothing at all. Haven't had much time for communicating. Work on
> catalog must progress and unlike most of the country, weather has been
> much better than usual here, so real gardening is also underway - YEA!
>
> Paul Black
> Zone 8
> Sunny and mild in Salem Oregon
>
> In iris-photos@egroups.com, Chuck Chapman <irischapman@n...>
>
> wrote:
> > Here is a photo of another ringed plicata SDB. This one has regular
>
> plicata
> > rather then the luminata pattern. Note ring on standard and falls
>
> and that the
> > plicata stitching is pushed back from the edge where the ring is.
>
> The pigment
> > in the ring seems to be a dusty-grey pink, although it could be a
>
> pinkish tan.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> [Image]