RE: TB:Form
- Subject: RE: [iris-photos]TB:Form
- From: "Dana" D*@peoplepc.com
- Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 06:58:17 -0600
- Importance: Normal
|
Just right off the top of my head, how can a flower be
balanced or in proportion if the standards are noticeably shorter? Picturing this in my mind, does not
give me a “balanced” picture?? Dana Dana Brown AIS Region 17 RVP Director ASI, TBIS AIS, ASI, MIS, RIS, SPIS, TBIS Malevil Iris Gardens Lubbock, TX Zone 7 USDA, Zone 10 Sunset -----Original
Message----- In a
message dated 1/4/2005 12:34:58 A.M. Central Standard Time,
IrisLady@comcast.net writes: the
shorter lacy standards seemed to make this one quite different. This
quote is from Margie V's comment about Mid-America #12. I agree that it
is an absolutely gorgeous iris. Several
recent introductions appear to have shorter standards than falls. I was
taught, 20 years ago, that the standards and falls should be of equal
length. A plant was inferior if there was a noticeable difference.
I've
quickly scanned my judges training book and can't find this under either
balance or form. (garden section) Is there anything in the book about short
standards? Something I'm missing? Betty W.
in South-central KY Zone 6 Yahoo! Groups Links
|
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: TB:Form
- From: W* P*
- From: W* P*
- RE: TB:Form
- References:
- TB:Form
- From: A*
- TB:Form
- Prev by Date: TB:Form
- Next by Date: Re: Re: Mid-America seedlings Char/ID numbers
- Previous by thread: TB:Form
- Next by thread: RE: TB:Form