Re: CULT comments requested on seedling 2

---

----- Original Message -----

From: c*@pav.research.panasonic.com

To: i*@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 5:38 AM

Subject: Re: [iris-photos] CULT comments requested on seedling 2

All of the bloom photos are lovely, but as hard as it is to comment on a
seedling without seeing it in the garden a few times, it seems impossible
without at least some more info on growth. Bud count, branching, number of
bloomstalks, year of bloom, that sort of stuff... Otherwise, aren't we just
commenting on a single bloom pic?

I have always leaned heavily towards the point of view that a seedling
without an improvement or distinction is "just another good plic" or
whatever, useful perhaps in more breeding but not worthy of introduction. 

cathy
zone 6b/7a
--
#-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-#
My words are mine, and don't reflect the views of my employer.
Catherine Button    Network Administrator    cathy@pavcal.com
          Phone: 609-518-3700 x4444          Fax: 609-518-3720

"When I drop in my tracks, I want the body to skid for a week."
  cathy@gixxergirl.org           http://www.gixxergirl.org/
#-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-#


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

ADVERTISEMENT