Re: [iris photos] TB: Hafts - Sultry Lady

---

• Subject: [iris-photos] Re: [iris photos] TB: Hafts - Sultry Lady
• From: a*
• Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 14:11:56 -0000

That is my contention. Hafts marks that develop into an extention of 
the flower design are highly valuable. Not only to appearancee but to 
future developments. In a self, it is a bad feature carried forward.  

Al Bullock
Z7 No Va

--- In iris-photos@y..., cathycampi@a... wrote:
> 
> 
> Sultry Lady (Nicholson 01)
> 
> Another iris that I feel the markings add to the appearance. As a  
self with > very little markings it would too similar to many others.
> 
> Cathy Campi
> Stockton Ca.


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Free $5 Love Reading
Risk Free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/3PCXaC/PfREAA/Ey.GAA/2gGylB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 

• Follow-Ups:
  • [PHOTO] Re: TB: Hafts - seedling
    • From: "H*"

• References:
  • [PHOTO] [iris photos] TB: Hafts - Sultry Lady
    • From: c*

• Prev by Date: Re: TB:Sdlg. Randy's 96-mgp-1
• Next by Date: [PHOTO] Re: TB: Hafts - seedling
• Previous by thread: [PHOTO] [iris photos] TB: Hafts - Sultry Lady
• Next by thread: [PHOTO] Re: TB: Hafts - seedling